Friday, February 1, 2013

Guns in America: A Matter of Interpretation?



We're now about six weeks post-Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting in which 20 six and seven year-olds were murdered plus six school employees.  Since then the ongoing debate about guns in the U.S. has been revived and is thriving, as are gun sales, in the wake of fears about government confiscation of guns in the name of “gun control” or “gun safety.”  Dueling identities for guns and gun owners--and even U.S. culture--have been constructed in the process, especially a seemingly defining national character as a “gun culture.” 

Just today, on the Peace and Justice Studies listserv in which I participate, someone posted a link to a Politico article in which former President Clinton discusses a pro-gun culture.  This culture, from Clinton’s perspective wields real power in U.S. politics and policymaking.  According to Clinton, speaking to Democratic party donors, “the issue of guns has a special emotional resonance in many rural states” and refusing to acknowledge that reality “is counterproductive” to any gun regulation effort.  He warns gun safety regulations advocates that even with polls showing broad public agreement with their efforts, “it’s not the public support that matters—it’s how strongly people feel about the issue.”  I’ll post a link to Byron Tau’s Politico report below.

In her 1986 book, The Creation of Patriarchy, Gerda Lerner, writing about gender identity constructions, that “the matrix of any idea is reality—people cannot conceive of something they have not themselves experienced or at least that others have before them experienced…images, metaphors, myths all have expression in forms which are ‘prefigured’ through past experience.  In periods of change, people reinterpret these symbols in new ways, which then lead to new combinations and new insights” (10).  While she’s speaking specifically of gender identity, I’ve been thinking a lot about her words in the context of gun identity constructions in the U.S. virtually every time a new episode of mass gun violence is reported on the news.
  • What images, metaphors, and myths about U.S. guns and gun owners have been dispersed out into the historical, social, cultural atmosphere from which our own if not the world’s perceptions of “America” arise?  
  • What are the realities in which such strong American pro-gun narratives and identity constructions were prefigured?
  • How did the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights gain virtually sacred status, seemingly surpassing in priority these days the First Amendment right to free speech—including apparently, the right to question or protest the divine authority given to guns in America by the most aggressively vocal pro-gun advocates?  
  • How has the idea of “common sense” gun safety legislation and regulation become equated with treasonous betrayal of “the” American ideal and Constitution, worthy of threats of violent rebellion if not all-out “revolutionary war”? 
The U.S. seems to have become a culture constrained by fear: fear of some threatening other invading our homes, schools, and even places of worship, not to mention crossing our borders to inflict harm to us as a nation; fear of a tyrannical government coming to confiscate all the guns of “law-abiding citizens.”  Clearly some of our fear is warranted since we can’t seem to escape a plague of violence and death perpetrated on a daily basis.  But we also seem to rely heavily on rather hypothetical fear to justify our need, if not right, to build personal arsenals of the most powerful firearms and rounds of the most explosive ammunition.   What is the idea-reality matrix that has brought us to this place of constant fear?
 How do we move beyond this fear-filled place?  How do we begin to re-identify and reinterpret the symbols defining our priorities, needs, and individual and national identities in truly life-preserving and life-affirming ways?  How do “we the people” create “new combinations and new insights” for ourselves and for the U.S. that allow us to meet and deal with conflict in less deadly and more productive ways?  I guess here would be as good as any place to brainstorm and build new possibilities, yes?



No comments:

Post a Comment